[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] Reply to co-chair (was: CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting t

To: Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] Reply to co-chair (was: CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting t
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 20:17:03 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <200003140403.XAA19384@world.std.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 14-Mar-2000 Eric Brunner wrote:
>         Aside: Personally I found the IANA decision to act on the .PN issue
>         (jurisdictional competency) pleasing.

IANA only acted at that time because the current administrator removed his
objection to any transfer, effectively consenting to it.    In that context, it
sets no precedent, and is not a statement of their jurisdiction.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE4zb0/8zLmV94Pz+IRAllpAKDNB+1oDSTuZsNEgFYBszogRtcsXQCeNmdS
6wMZcTPSlVg6I96DczCvcro=
=dRKL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [wg-c] Reply to co-chair (was: CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting t
  - From: "Josh Elliott" <jelliott@tucows.com>

References:
- [wg-c] Reply to co-chair (was: CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs ...)
  - From: Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] Reply to co-chair (was: CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs ...)
Next by Date: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "principles")
Prev by thread: [wg-c] Reply to co-chair (was: CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs ...)
Next by thread: RE: [wg-c] Reply to co-chair (was: CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting t
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread