[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] about the consensus call

To: "Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] about the consensus call
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:43:51 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <s8cf4d9b.098@gw1.rspab.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 15-Mar-2000 Kevin J. Connolly wrote:
> I move that this WG report to the Names Council that it is seriously broke 
> and needs to be reconstituted.

"My position isn't the one in the majority, so the workgroup process is not
working."

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE4z/YH8zLmV94Pz+IRAp8OAKCp2+dMM6ovvmcb+9l4npS5ZX0uwwCeOThP
ppZ5FgQe2Xakw1Qi4/0f13E=
=iZc7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [wg-c] about the consensus call
  - From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] INT domain
Next by Date: [wg-c] The scope of gTLDs
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] about the consensus call
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] about the consensus call
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread