RE: [wg-c] about the consensus call; How do we get a degree of

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 16-Mar-2000 Christopher Ambler wrote:
> On 16-Mar-2000 Robert F. Connelly wrote:
>>> I therefore do not endorse the idea of having this group compound its
>>> problem by adding a hundred new variables to the selection process *at
> this
>>> time*.  In fact, this group may *never* be able to come to a consensus on
>>> the actual gTLDs to be delegated.
>>
>>I agree with Robert completely.
> 
> I do as well, but only because it's out of the scope of this WG to come
> to consensus on the actual TLDs to be delegated. This group is tasked to
> decide HOW new TLDs will be delegated, not WHICH.
> 

Precisely.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE40IL38zLmV94Pz+IRAm/DAJ4lA8KJX02u5E8hMUe97LPwRobJmACfcDGC
dlNbzDFoqaKPM7oRo5zemwA=
=0744
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----