[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] Exclusions

To: Christopher Ambler <cambler@iodesign.com>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] Exclusions
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 15:10:15 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <006901bf8f9a$8ba364e0$4a0e379d@redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 16-Mar-2000 Christopher Ambler wrote:
> I think that it's only fair that any company/entity that is a registrar
> should not be eligible for inclusion in the testbed phase for new
> registries. After the testbed, they should be allowed to apply, but
> to give a company testbed status in BOTH the registrar and
> registry phases is unfair to other companies.

Why?  What does one have to do with the other?

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE40WnX8zLmV94Pz+IRAsulAKDWAxkoQcn8Qmaydd2WgOzkkxTEIgCdFWKC
jJz/LwgrwRPfGw4VOUpZ2PM=
=Ziwi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- [wg-c] Exclusions
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] Restatement of wg-c discussion
Next by Date: RE: [wg-c] Restatement of wg-c discussion
Prev by thread: [wg-c] Exclusions
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Exclusions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread