RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

>For the record it is fascinating to see post-hoc analysis of history by
>those who were not involved, particularly when their interpretations so
>readily dismiss the first-hand data of those who were.  Still, they are
>legitimate participants in the current process.
>
>The fact that the ignorance is underscored by a pointed effort at
>thoroughly personalizing perspectives may detract from one's personal
>evaluation of them.  Unfortunately, it is extremely relevant to the quality
>of their input.

My god, Dave. I could say the same thing - indeed I will - about IANA's
involvement with IOD and the meeting of 31 July, 1996. You were not there.
I was.

Shut up and sit down, you're annoying.

Christopher