RE: [wg-c] "within the process"

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 17-Mar-2000 Dave Crocker wrote:
> see above.  NSF was never an authority over IANA.

So you say.  IANA had no authority that wasn't specifically delegated to it
Dave. 

You keep saying otherwise, and your support for those statements are just
more...statements.  Do you have documentation that shows that IANA had that
authority?  It certainly doesn't have it now, even ccTLD changes are being
approved by the DoC prior to being entered into the roots.  You claim it had
the authority in the past?  Then why didn't it get the CORE domains entered
sooner?  For 2 years before the DoC got involved CORE and IANA were promising
consumers those domains would be added, but never seemed able to accomplish it.

If they had the power......well, why are we here?

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE40bgx8zLmV94Pz+IRArFcAJ4u18LNAvD9RpzNRgqsBfMPo/6cMQCdEV5S
TlhOVvPOzrlSiV97aYLe3u4=
=2BqX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----