Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 20-Mar-2000 Dave Crocker wrote:
> At 08:09 PM 3/19/00 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>>On 20-Mar-2000 Dave Crocker wrote:
>> > At 07:48 PM 3/19/00 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>> >>On 20-Mar-2000 Dave Crocker wrote:
>> >> > 
>> <http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iab-unique-dns-root-00.txt>
>>
>>How about a straight answer, Dave. How does this apply to the discussion 
>>of the
>>shared/non-shared registry subject?  I see nothing in that paragraph or
>>ANYWHERE else in the document that has any relevance at all.
> 
> The document highlights the need for coherent (unified, centralized, etc.) 
> management.  At base that means it does not have a collaborative, shared 
> scheme but rests management of each node (domain) with a single
> administration

Dave, the document is very specific in discussing the impact of multiple roots
vs a single root.  This has absolutely nothing to do with non-shared gTLDs. 
You are still grasping here.  Please, a simple answer, what in this document
applies to the shared/non-shared TLD discussion underway currently.  If it
doesn't have any, please just say it so that we can put this to rest.  

I see no "technical constraints" to the existance and creation of multiple
non-shared and shared registries coexisting and competing in the domain name
registration services area.   And I see nothing in the IAB document that states
that there are any.
 
> 
>>I think you are trying to pull something out of the hat that just isn't
>>there.
> 
> I note that you have yet to provide a simple, straightforward answer to the 
> original, simple, straightforward question I posed to you about your own 
> assertion.

About what assertion, Dave?  That there is no "technical constraint" that
mandates shared registries? 

I think that statements speaks for itself.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE41aoj8zLmV94Pz+IRAkMnAJ4qpD6jn+wevlAHi8kqGit9m+QOvwCgmR8O
jRiHu790mEJ9dj+WmqvPeoQ=
=MRBk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----