[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs

To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 22:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org, Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.0.20000319223121.02684f00@mail.bayarea.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 20-Mar-2000 Dave Crocker wrote:
> The reference was to the IAB and neither the reference to them nor the 
> document they wrote cites any "imposed" requirements. 

So when you mentioned "technical constraints imposted by the IAB" you admit
that was probably a poor choice of words?  I'll agree and leave it at that.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE41cu08zLmV94Pz+IRAkNfAJ4oG/Q12JhBAu5HxxLfMztTpMtp4gCg0P9U
w4bE1FSYbzezDQvB5Gp2LJc=
=CgbY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
Next by Date: [wg-c] Important -- voting on WG report
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread