RE: [wg-c] WG-C report -- final version

["Roeland M. J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Perhaps, you missed the debate when it became obvious that the IP folks were
gonna deadlock us unless we agreed to a more moderate stance. I agree with
you, but am willing to make the expedient compromise.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 1:16 AM
> To: wg-c@dnso.org; Jonathan Weinberg
> Subject: Re: [wg-c] WG-C report -- final version
>
>
> Jonathan,
> You have done a great job managing this process but I am
> forced to vote no
> to the WG C report. How many is the wrong question. Recommending an
> oligopoly of 6-10 will do nothing for consumer confidence as it will
> encourage warehousing and cyber squatting without the
> differentiation that
> is so desperately required.
> Philip
>
> Philip Sheppard
> AIM - European Brands Association
> 9  av. des Gaulois  B-1040 Brussels
> Tel +322 736 0305 Fax +322 734 6702
>