[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-c] Ambler/Meuller/Walsh/Meyer on .NAA
> MHSC (Meyer) vs .NAA
> http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Arc00/msg02229.html
> No non-white charters.
Sorry son, that's not what it says. I'll grant, you had the backbone to post
the original message. But, as I said, your proposal was definite proof that
you had some stones.
> http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Arc00/msg02245.html
> Non-ICANN process (alternate root "gTLD") implementations
> take precedence
> over ICANN process proposals.
Also, not what it says. I simply argued for ANY process over ad hoc
additions, like your NAA proposal.
> Kitakitamatsinopowaw,
> Eric
How does a WASP get to represent AmerInds anyway, blondie?
BTW, are you aware that the California tribes just got skinned again
(res-based casinos)?