[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed

To: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:03:59 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org, mark@bitshift.org, Christopher Ambler <cambler@iodesign.com>, John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>, James Love <love@cptech.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003221754090.13852-100000@loki.ar.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 23-Mar-2000 Rick H Wesson wrote:
> The access and ability to run a gTLD should
> always be serving some public interest

Public interest?  Sounds socialistic to me.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE42Yme8zLmV94Pz+IRAsFBAKDYUx+MNZrh8thM2wxcHgVWUPrwAwCgolEL
ZUF/4rp4+/7jMQrt3dkC2c8=
=658M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed
  - From: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread