Re: [wg-c] ICANN June meeting and new gTLDs

[Jeff Shrewsbury Info Avenue <iamarketing@InfoAve.Net>]

Or perhaps it's because the reporter doesn't know what the hell he is
talking about.

js
At 01:56 PM 3/22/00 -0800, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>Jumping the gun a little? Aren't they a CORE member? Perhaps that explains
>why they said that one of the domains was likely to be .nom. On the other
>hand, perhaps they said that because they're intending to be a registry for
>.nom?
>
>Are we having fun yet?
>
>--
>Christopher Ambler
>chris@the.web
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Rothnie, Warwick" <Warwick.Rothnie@msj.com.au>
>To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 1:49 PM
>Subject: [wg-c] ICANN June meeting and new gTLDs
>
>
>Mallesons Stephen Jaques
>Confidential communication
>
>An Australian registrar for .com and .com.au, Melbourne IT,  has been
>reported in the local press as stating that ICANN's June meeting is expected
>to approve 10 new gTLDs including three new categories, each of which may
>have 2 or 3 new domains.  The categories identified are "non-commercial",
>commercial domains other than .com and chartered domains for members of
>international professional and commercial organisations.  The link to the
>report is <http://www.afr.com.au/content/000323/inform/inform3.html>.
>
>Warwick A Rothnie
>Partner
>Mallesons Stephen Jaques Melbourne
>Direct line (61 3) 9643 4254
>Fax (61 3) 9643 5999
>
>