[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements

To: "Roeland M. J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 12:14:23 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Kendall Dawson <kendall@motif1.obs-us.com>, wg-c@dnso.org, Christopher Ambler <cambler@iodesign.com>, Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
In-Reply-To: <001501bf9753$8eb59d90$eaaf6cc7@PEREGRIN>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 26-Mar-2000 Roeland M. J. Meyer wrote:
> I have it on reasobable authority that WEB is such a TLD. There are certain
> other SLDs that are also trademarked.  In fact, many SLDs have actually been
> forced to change hands BECAUSE of trademark issues. I see no difference
> between an SLD and TLD here.

The decision is specifically covering only the TLD portion, and no, .web is not
a registered trademark according to the USPTO.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE43m+f8zLmV94Pz+IRAt2NAKDMPQ264vDbXt6TxyqFT0su35PISQCg5PN3
6VV08mA0zsKzMkHprmvyZXw=
=7JK5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements
  - From: "Roeland M. J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Application Requirements
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Application Requirements
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Application Requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread