RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements

["Roeland M. J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

What is the source of your information? I have, at least one, flying the(tm)
flag.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> William X. Walsh
> Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2000 4:53 PM
> To: Roeland M. J. Meyer
> Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 27-Mar-2000 Roeland M. J. Meyer wrote:
> > What is also at issue is the fact that many SLDs, and a few
> TLDs, were
> > granted trademark status.
>
> You apparently missed the part where I said that no TLDs were
> granted trademark
> status.  Not a single one.   Everyone attempt has been
> rejected by the USPTO
> even before these policies were in place.
>
> - --
> William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> http://userfriendly.com/
> Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
> GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
> Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/
>
> iD8DBQE43rDr8zLmV94Pz+IRApSxAJ4zbodfbBKuIZI4ETVlTi35sQ+qCwCgmpp5
> OrtUmiIbPlYLRy2S01A9Fes=
> =YEYI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>