RE: [wg-c] Two Para D&I Summary (PPE)

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 09-Apr-2000 Eric Brunner wrote:
> Title: Two Para D&I Summary (PPE) 
> 
> The model for deployment advocated in PPE is application by a user [1] to a
> gTLD evaluation working group [2], affirmative recommendation by that group,
> confirmation by the DNSO NC and ICANN Board, and execution of a delegation
> agreement. The application may be made in response to an RFP (see also PPD).
> 
> The model for implementation advocated in PPE is the public resource DNS
> model,
> with shared registries operated on or near their cost-recovery basis, with
> some
> affirmative policy or jurisdictional scope applied by the registry operator.
> The policy/scope may be "weak/none" (e.g., identical to NSI registries) or
> "strong/specific", (e.g., identical to the North American Aboriginal
> proposal).

Sorry but this will not fly.  There is absolutely no reason for all registries
to be run as shared registries, and there is no reason to demand that all
registries operate under a cost recovery basis.   

Let's not revisit this issue, you will never gain consensus behind these points.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE48OWa8zLmV94Pz+IRAohSAKCh4vPh6NxFDz5nTs/35+DmroSLGwCgpMKc
XgHm4ijRIugy7V8JdKabl6U=
=9pSy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----