[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Two Para D&I Summary (PPE)

To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Two Para D&I Summary (PPE)
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 01:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org, Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.0.20000410000358.00ba4b70@mail.bayarea.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 10-Apr-2000 Dave Crocker wrote:
> At 11:48 PM 4/9/00 -0700, Simon Higgs wrote:
>>How does cost-recovery not become price-fixing (illegal in the most 
>>countries including the US)?
> 
> (here we go again.)
> 
> constraints on pricing are often entirely legal.

And under what conditions?  Those conditions are VERY specific, and you have a
real threshold to meet under the law.    And this protection alone may be the
only protection we have from your ilk to force this type of model onto every
registry.  

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE48ZBW8zLmV94Pz+IRAjVcAJ0eywGUGDWyhvKwtemVrx2M4z+ScQCfTSGd
dfAtVyNUvXgIc9DgxB6yasI=
=uAhz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Two Para D&I Summary (PPE)
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] Two Para D&I Summary (PPE)
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Two Para D&I Summary (PPE)
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] Two Para D&I Summary (PPE)
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Two Para D&I Summary (PPE)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread