[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] S/K principles

To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] S/K principles
From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:41:04 -0700
In-Reply-To: <022301bfa2ff$4fe178c0$6501a8c0@pc01.aim.be>; from Philip Sheppard on Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 05:13:22PM +0200
Mail-Followup-To: wg-c@dnso.org
References: <022301bfa2ff$4fe178c0$6501a8c0@pc01.aim.be>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 05:13:22PM +0200, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> Charter and open
> This is not a black and white choice. Even dot com has some defining
> characteristics.

Actually, it is much closer to black and white than you imply. 
"Charter" in context usually means "*enforced* criteria for restriction
of registrations to particular registrants."

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain

Follow-Ups:
- TLD Charters (was Re: [wg-c] S/K principles)
  - From: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] S/K principles
  - From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
- Re: [wg-c] S/K principles
  - From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] S/K principles
Next by Date: RE: [wg-c] S/K principles [Was: Working Group C agenda]
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] S/K principles
Next by thread: TLD Charters (was Re: [wg-c] S/K principles)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread