RE: [wg-c] Mark's Proposal

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 10-Apr-2000 Christopher Ambler wrote:
> Mark's proposal is a clear shot at the longest-standing
> pioneer registry, and nothing else. The immediate and
> vocal support from Crocker and Crispin should be
> the first clue as to its intent. If this working group has
> been reduced to petty shots like this, rest assured that
> it will be given all the consideration and action that it is due.
> 
> By the way, the claims that CORE registrars don't have
> registered names is false. I just checked the IOD database,
> and found over 700 registered .web names as coming from
> CORE registrars

Just like ICANN Accredited registrars cannot accept a registration for a
com/net/org domain name that has not yet become available, but might later,
CORE and IOD should not be able to come into this with pre-existing
registrations of any form.  If they want to participate in new gTLDs, its a
clean slate or not at all.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE48lZq8zLmV94Pz+IRAlmyAKCrn4ov9aU+jM+Zljflbzp0IBxXiACgvYT9
vgy1BLfxK7mvPdaaH+5A25M=
=F6/o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----