[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs

To: James Love <love@cptech.org>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:48:21 -0700
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10004110043060.23246-100000@milan.essential.org>
References: <XFMail.20000410200324.william@userfriendly.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 12:48 AM 4/11/00 -0400, James Love wrote:
>or anyone else ever wanted to create an alternative root system or some
>new TLD that wasn't approved by the establishment? Even if someone
>thought it was a bad idea, wouldn't that be a sign of risk taking,
>innovation, or spunk? Or should it be treated as some criminal act that
>has to be punished?


The crux of one line of debate is the degree of support claimed and/or 
present, from "the establishment".

However, your question is exactly right, in the current context.

The answer is that prior acts should be entirely ignored.

d/


=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464
675 Spruce Drive,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs
  - From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs
  - From: James Love <love@cptech.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Mark's Proposal
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread