Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT

[Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>]

#1: to seek a range of registry-specific policy and/or jurisdiction models
YES.

Note that the question is not about business models. I hope I'd answer the
same even if the only charter example available was for HIV, or museums.
We should find out what something other than the NSI monster looks like and
make friends with it sooner rather than later.. 

#2: S/K
NO.

1 is contrary to competition, 2 is without reference to the capacity of the
TLD delegatee to exercise an enforcement policy, 3 is daft, 4 is redundant,
5 is underspecified and 6 is denial of the present condition.

Mind I could "consens" to anything that didn't actually say "shoot the
indians", but volunteering to be the DNS village idiot is extravagant.

#3: i18n-in-libns
NO. Like Harald I know what this is, and the answer is "eventually, but not
today, and not in today's DNS Wars carnival".

Cheerfully, consensually, etc.,
Eric