Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

At least you're honest about it.
 
 --
Christopher Ambler
chris@the.web

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
> To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 2:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
> 
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > 
> > On 11-Apr-2000 Christopher Ambler wrote:
> > > You are proposing a WG on a *policy* matter.
> > 
> > Not unlike everything else this and every other workgroup has done.
> >  
> > > ICANN's very own mandate says that they oversee TECHNICAL
> > > COORDINATION of the Internet.
> > > 
> > > How do you justify this?
> > 
> > That this mandate is nothing more than an illusion.
> > 
> > - --
> > William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> > http://userfriendly.com/
> > GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
> > Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/
> > 
> > iD8DBQE485jP8zLmV94Pz+IRAlbwAKCxANSEJ2ySRMfMsc7TIfQG2C5QaQCfSTmA
> > /RgxU14qK5cbfAbQd3n86m4=
> > =tU88
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----