[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Consensus call

To: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20000412111730.00b48390@postoffice.att.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 12-Apr-2000 Simon Higgs wrote:
> 
> Item 1: Yes (with the reservation that nothing tangible has yet been 
> officially proposed by ICANN, only the pre-existing RFC1591 submissions)

Those are really "Jon Postel" submissions (which even he later disclaimed), and
have no relevance to this process or to ICANN, thank you.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE49P2Z8zLmV94Pz+IRAkJHAKCsul39Jaf0D8/a7G3wSSO3GsnPBACeOWNq
BiPhzDMW8kihksJNjMzWv4Q=
=t5k9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
  - From: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
  - From: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread