Re: [wg-c] Consensus call

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 13-Apr-2000 Christopher Ambler wrote:
> He posted the list *AFTER* initiating the IAHC plan, by the way, so
> even if your argument were valid, it is incorrect.

The act of posting the list means nothing, Chris.  

> Authority is irrelevant

No, it really isn't.


To make you happy, I'll rephrase (means the same damn thing though):
"The list has no relevance whatsoever, and even Postel would not recognize it as
binding or valid or having any standing whatsoever."


- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE49Qen8zLmV94Pz+IRAoY/AJ4gMp8L0uJ7JqfuIIi6Ufl9cagXMgCdGFuJ
nnlLWERMPaRf+C5bJkDIrhY=
=lvde
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----