RE: [wg-c] Re: Dot Com monopoly and new TLDs

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 20-Apr-2000 Dave Crocker wrote:
> At 09:26 AM 4/20/00 -0400, James Love wrote:
>>(below) is, but I do confess to not being an old hand at the "DNS Wars."
> 
> Shall every appearance of a new enthusiast to theis topic force a re-start 
> of the clock and a re-visiting of every aspect of every issue?
> 
> In effect, that is what you appear to be seeking.  And before you disagree, 
> think very hard about the extent of history, the pragmatics of making 
> progress in an open forum like this, and the nature of the challenges you 
> are tending to offer.

Forgive Dave, James.  He mistakenly believes that any issue that was already
addressed by his little IAHC process is no longer open for discussion, and has
already been decided to be "consensus."

And anyone not from the IAHC or supporting the IAHC process is not "worthy."

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE4/y4M8zLmV94Pz+IRAh8yAJ9ogJXRKzZa4a0MHidHZ5CDdHOe6QCg9Akm
9oVleOozaLCICsvdlnFWzRc=
=Z7kP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----