Re: [wg-c] Respecting the process

[Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>]

> 2. Did the Names Council believe (it was the) (READ there was) consensus
> that the initial number for roll out should be 6 to 10 new gTLDs ?
> 
> Question 2 was not "Do you believe there is a consensus within WG C on this
> issue" - that would be a daft question as the answer is in black and white
> already in the way WG C defined consensus.

One must of course wonder where the Names Council found this silent voice
of consensus or non-consensus that was not participating in the working
group on the topic at hand.

I submit that what the NC has done is engage in the highest degree of
hubris.

		--karl--