Re: [wg-d] "Interim Measures"

["Alejandro Pisanty, DGSCA y FQ, UNAM" <apisan@servidor.unam.mx>]

Hi!

maybe a further tuning would help. Also we need to think more generally
than the present situation of WG-C though of course it is a lab case study
of what can happen as this organization grows.

1. Are all interested parties really taking part? With the very limited
sizes of the WGs, and the even smaller numbers of people actually taking
part, this is a serious question and it can extend to the point of putting
legitimacy in doubt altogether. The chair of the WG and its members should
make sure of calling in everybody that must be in. 

2. Maybe we can retake what is valuable from the "balanced workgroups"
question. Make sure not only all parties express their views at a given
point in time, also make sure that the constituency reps in the WG do so.
This will allow a further, restricted measure of consensus, to complement
whatever others are available (votes in an open group, faction reports,
etc.).

Still the approach is v). These modifications could make it work a bit
better.

Alejandro


.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty, 
     Director General de Servicios de Computo Academico
     (Director, Computing Academic Services)
     Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM)
     Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Mexico City DF MEXICO

Tel. (+52-5) 622-8541, 622-8542; Fax 622-8540
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .