[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-d] "Interim Measures"



It is the fairest possible approach for working groups.
Thank you Javier, Brett and David.

Elisabeth

> From owner-wg-d@dnso.org Fri Sep  3 18:56 MET 1999
> Subject: Re: [wg-d] "Interim Measures"
> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 99 12:55:49 -0400
> From: "Bret A. Fausett" <baf@fausett.com>
> To: "Working Group D" <wg-d@dnso.org>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> 
> Javier wrote:
> 
> >(v)  Ask the working group to prepare -as the output of the WG- a report 
> >with all the different views that have been presented in the discussions. 
> >It is not the output that we would have desired, but it does not look like 
> >we can go any further.
> 
> Another good option. What would you think about requiring that each 
> report contain the following elements?
> 
>    (a)  a detailed overview of the proposal;
> 
>    (b)  a full analysis of who and what systems
>         might be impacted by the proposal;
> 
>    (c)  the specific steps that would be necessary 
>         to take to implement the proposal;
> 
>    (d)  the costs and risks, if any, of implementing
>         the proposal and how they would be be borne;
> 
>    (e)  a statement of which stakeholders have
>         been consulted about the proposal and what
>         support the proposal has in the various
>         stakeholder communities.
> 
> (These come from the list suggested in an earlier post by a WG-D member, 
> see:
> http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-d/Archives/msg00158.html)
> 
> Such a proposal might also have a place for "rebuttals," so that once 
> each group had read the others' reports, they could have time to draft a 
> short reply.
> 
> It might then be helpful to publish the report for a public comment. You 
> might even allow each group to revise (hopefully, compromise) their 
> reports prior to submitting a final output of the WG to the NC.
> 
> I encourage others to join this thread, as we need to have something 
> specific to send to the NC by the middle of next week.
> 
>        -- Bret
> 
>      
> 
>