[wg-review] Around Two weeks before Jan 15th?

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

From: "Miles B. Whitener" <mbw@i-theta.com>

> > Since we have an amazingly short fuse to complete work
> ...
>
> Why is this?
>
> Isn't there ANYBODY else out there who's suspicious of _anything_ that's
> being rammed through during the last few days of the Clinton era?  And
over
> a Western holiday season, just like the transfer of the US Domain to
Network
> Solutions.  Am I the only one that's more than curious about this?  I
don't
> believe it.

There have been five working groups in DNSO so far.
Four of them were dissolved after having accomplished their missions
and one, WG-D, is still existing since its formation 1999. June.

The five working groups had to revert to WG repeatedly
until the WG's final report was submitted to NC and
it was accepted by NC.

Eric wrote;

> Now that everyone knows everyone, could we start
> the wg ?
> What will be our roles in the group ?

Appreciating those who started the discussion already,
I would like to remind members here that we have around
two weeks before we formalize the position of this working group.

The role should be more clarified in the "charter" discussion
which was started by Karl and Roeland.

Thanks,
YJ