Re: [wg-review] constituency composition

[Phil King <yofelipe@excite.com>]

On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 09:32:32 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:

>  On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:25:47PM -0500, Milton Mueller wrote:
>  > Let's throw this idea out immediately.  We don't assign entire
>  > constituencies to individual organizations.  If we start doing that,
>  > then let's have an ACM constituency, and IBM constituency, and a
>  > Syracuse University constituency (all of which have more members than
>  > ISOC). 
>  
>  But none of which are official NGOs...
>  
>  > >>> Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com> 12/27/00 12:03PM >>>
>  > 
>  > Since ISOC is now an official UN sanctioned NGO, there certainly are 
>  > some intriguing possibilities there.
>  > 
>  
>  -- 
>  Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
>  kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain

--------------

Ok, the idea of constituencies that don't go farther than an individual
corporate group, not so hot, but to get targeted individual domain name
holders constituencies in the manner of the commercial targeted
constituencies might have some value, if it can be clearly defined.--Ideas:?



Yo, Felipe (I, Phillip)
Phil King
Butte America
(The Richest Hill On Earth)





_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/