[Bounced] Re: [wg-review] constituency composition

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 01:00:42 +0100
To: wg-review@dnso.org
From: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [wg-review] constituency composition
Cc: idno-discuss@idno.org

Sorry, Kent,
I do not understand your rationale,
On 18:03 27/12/00, Kent Crispin said:
>A concrete illustration: the NCC has 160 members; assume for the moment
>that Joops organization has 160 members, and becomes the IDNOC.  One of
>the NCC members is the ACM, an organization with 80,000 members, last I
>looked.  This means that a single individual voting in the IDNO has the
>same power as the ACM voting in the NCC.

1. In the DNSO/BC I have one vote as a one employee business. Disney three.
     AT&T three. I am therefore worth a lot of AT&T employees.

2. you say Jopp's proposed IDNO would represent million of people. It means
     that an IDNOC member woud reprensent 100.000 individual domain name
     holders. Seems fair when comparing with the one NCC member with 80.000.

3. you support a second Constituency by the ISOC. We are probably 5000
     ISOC Members. It would mean that 1 IDNO represent 1/22.000.000 of a
     constituency, 1 NCC remote individual 1/12.800.000 of a constituency,
and
     one ISOC Member 1/5000 of a constituency

Jefsey