<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] constituency composition
- To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
- Subject: Re: [wg-review] constituency composition
- From: "James Wright" <sirjames@jalyn.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 09:03:58 -0700
- References: <001501c06cab$211c8ae0$e4df7ad1@jo> <3A4A7B0F.C1DF0884@iciiu.org> <3A4A8229.F670CBAA@iciiu.org> <3A4A830A.461B85E@iciiu.org> <3A4A851B.A6AAFC35@iciiu.org>
- Sender: owner-wg-review@dnso.org
> ISOC runs ICANN. It doesn't need any constituency, much less another
> one in addition to the NCDNHC.
>
Enough with the ISOC. What have they to do with the deliberation at hand?
Besides, any organization that dumps its' founding members in the name of
profit ceases to become an effective voice and is not worth recognizing.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|