ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[wg-review] 1. [Charter] Review Process Background and Charter Discussion


YJ, a couple of quick questions.

> In responses please provide concrete examples and the basis for
conclusions,
> rather than just conclusory statements. Please also make clear from whom
> (not the person's name, but what interest(s) they represent) the comments
> are coming from. Please also offer specific suggestions; either that
> specific DNSO things are working well or that they are not; and if they
are
> not how we think they can be improved.

Aside from this paragraph, it was my impression that you are looking for
thoughts, opinions, and ideas with which to create a consensus report to
present to the NC.

Question 1:  Do you wish ideas or are you interested strictly in applied
detail written in technical legalese and four-part harmony?

Question 2:  Do you wish these forms to be sent to the list or to you?

Thank you.

James






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>