<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[wg-review] 1. [Charter] Review Process Background and Charter Discussion
YJ, a couple of quick questions.
> In responses please provide concrete examples and the basis for
conclusions,
> rather than just conclusory statements. Please also make clear from whom
> (not the person's name, but what interest(s) they represent) the comments
> are coming from. Please also offer specific suggestions; either that
> specific DNSO things are working well or that they are not; and if they
are
> not how we think they can be improved.
Aside from this paragraph, it was my impression that you are looking for
thoughts, opinions, and ideas with which to create a consensus report to
present to the NC.
Question 1: Do you wish ideas or are you interested strictly in applied
detail written in technical legalese and four-part harmony?
Question 2: Do you wish these forms to be sent to the list or to you?
Thank you.
James
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|