Re: [wg-review] Time's up for ICANN

[Bruce <bmjames@swbell.net>]

I agree, to take this topic off this WG list. we have more than we can
handle now. I hereby make a motion to take this topic off this WG agenda.
May I have a Second?

Bruce James

----- Original Message -----
From: "DPF" <david@farrar.com>
To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2000 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] Time's up for ICANN


On Sun, 31 Dec 2000 20:43:08 +1100, Len Lindon wrote:

>One issue that needs to be resolved is the likelihood that ICANN will cease
>to exist or will be substantially broken up by March 2001.

That is easy - there is none at all.

>There should be an immediate recommendation to form a Working Group to
>urgently discuss and research options in the light of the ICANN Breakup
>Case.

This is outside the terms of reference of this working group.  If you
feel a need to keep pushing this issue can you please do so in the GA
where it is somewhat more on topic.

DPF
________________________________________________________________________
<david at farrar dot com>
NZ Usenet FAQs - http://www.dpf.ac.nz/usenet/nz
ICQ 29964527



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.225 / Virus Database: 107 - Release Date: 12/22/2000