Re: [wg-review] Time's up for ICANN

["Chris McElroy" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

Len, sorry. I hope another time we can discuss it further, but I have to
second Bruce's motion that we take the topic off the agenda for now.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce" <bmjames@swbell.net>
To: "DPF" <david@farrar.com>; <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] Time's up for ICANN


> I agree, to take this topic off this WG list. we have more than we can
> handle now. I hereby make a motion to take this topic off this WG agenda.
> May I have a Second?
>
> Bruce James
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "DPF" <david@farrar.com>
> To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
> Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2000 6:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [wg-review] Time's up for ICANN
>
>
> On Sun, 31 Dec 2000 20:43:08 +1100, Len Lindon wrote:
>
> >One issue that needs to be resolved is the likelihood that ICANN will
cease
> >to exist or will be substantially broken up by March 2001.
>
> That is easy - there is none at all.
>
> >There should be an immediate recommendation to form a Working Group to
> >urgently discuss and research options in the light of the ICANN Breakup
> >Case.
>
> This is outside the terms of reference of this working group.  If you
> feel a need to keep pushing this issue can you please do so in the GA
> where it is somewhat more on topic.
>
> DPF
> ________________________________________________________________________
> <david at farrar dot com>
> NZ Usenet FAQs - http://www.dpf.ac.nz/usenet/nz
> ICQ 29964527
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.225 / Virus Database: 107 - Release Date: 12/22/2000
>
>