DNSO Archives: [wg-review]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Rough Proposal C - correction

To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Rough Proposal C - correction
From: Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 12:10:04 -0700
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010102110629.0200d1c0@mail.feedwriter.com>
References: <sa50d78f.096@gwia201.syr.edu>
Sender: owner-wg-review@dnso.org

At 11:47 AM 1/2/01, Greg Burton wrote:
>The informal poll I put up (

>http://www.pollcat.com/ty0p1puu4w_a
  is the poll
>  http://www.pollcat.com/report/ty0p1puu4w_a
  are the responses.

Sorry about the formatting.

Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Rough Proposal C - correction
  - From: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net>

References:
- Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Rough Proposal C -eliminate NC, keepconstituencies
  - From: "Milton Mueller" <mueller@syr.edu>
- Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Rough Proposal C - eliminate NC, keepconstituencies
  - From: Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>