Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Rough Proposal C - correction

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net>]

the poll would be significantly more informative and useful if we knew what
constituancies the voters represented.

i am certain that this will be one of the questions asked by the names
council members when reviewing the report so i will ask it now rather than
later.

it would be quite troublesome if it ended up that 80 -90 % of the voters
were members of just 1 or 2 constituancies yet their impressions of the
effectiveness of their own constituancy were "blanketly attributed" to all
current constituancies

i look forward to further elaboration

ken stubbs

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Burton" <sidna@feedwriter.com>
To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Rough Proposal C - correction


> At 11:47 AM 1/2/01, Greg Burton wrote:
> >The informal poll I put up (
>
> >http://www.pollcat.com/ty0p1puu4w_a
>   is the poll
> >  http://www.pollcat.com/report/ty0p1puu4w_a
>   are the responses.
>
> Sorry about the formatting.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> sidna@feedwriter.com
>