<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: Re: [wg-review] Proposal for ICANN Board electors and funding.
1/2/01 1:51:32 PM, "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net> wrote:
>if your saying that that is the direction this working group intends to go
>then i STRONGLY BELIEVE that the group is straying way off direction and
>frankly feel that the majority of the names council members would most
>probably agree with me here.
>
>i am most anxious to hear from YJ, roberto, joop, herald , jonathan and
>others as to whether they feel this is the direction they wish to move in.
>
>if this be so, then i will fold up my little tent and wend my way into the
>night, disappointed that i have been the victim of serious
>misrepresentations.
>
>ken stubbs
Frankly Ken, I am disappointed that you feel that way. However, when the future public mnemonics of global History are under corporate siege, you
better believe that the @Large IS @Large. Obfuscating the issues is a transparent delay tactic, so is personal indignation. As STRONGLY as you
BELIEVE in whatever it is you believe in, what makes your BELIEF any more legitimate than anyone else's. When, if ever, will there be a WG that will
address the issues you so offhandedly dismiss? My guess? well, assuming the same people are setting these WG's up... probably NEVER!? Anyway, I
for one will miss you if do pack up your tent...
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
Hermes Network, Inc.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|