<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[wg-review] Re: Appeal to focus on DNSO review
Peter wrote:
> with the idea of separating at-large issues from this WG. The wg-review,
as
> chartered by the NC, is to review DNSO by its own constituencies' members.
>
> while I respect the inputs and comments of GA members, I would request
that
> they deliver such comments off-line, directly to any DNSO constituency
> members, as a means of providing inputs or advice.
>
> We must narrow our focus, and the traffic on this list to DNSO review
> topics, else we will lose time, and the interest and participation of
those
> who are on the list for its stated purpose.
Thank you Peter for pointing this out.
We need to first come up with "Progress Report" until January 15
and if is is noted by NC that Review WG group needs more time
then this group may reach out the other issues based upon the rough
consensus in this group.
Thanks,
YJ
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|