Re: Re: [wg-review] Proposal for ICANN Board electors and funding.

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:12:19PM -0500, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
>          Keep your tent unfolded, Ken.  The job of this WG is to review the 
> structure, processes and functioning of the DNSO; that's a big enough job 
> for anyone.

I think that is a serious misrepresentation of the charter of this WG. 
The charter for this WG is to operate for a constrained time to provide
input for the Review TF, in terms of the specific questions which YJ
distributed.  As I understand it, the TF has a time limit set by the
board, and that is why the time limit for this WG is so constrained. 

It appears that there are a number of people feverishly operating
outside that mandate, in the hopes of forcing the NC to accept an
expanded mandate.  But the bottom line is that the TF has to get its 
report to the Board regardless.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html