Re: Re: [wg-review] Proposal for ICANN Board electors and funding.

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 06:37:27PM -0800, Chris McElroy wrote:
> You are welcome to address me directly Ken. The post is relevant when some
> think Individuals should pay again for representation when they already do
> so. Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they are off
> topic. And yes I do have a beef. A beef about people's rights getting
> stepped on and this IS the place to do that.

No, you are seriously mistaken.  This is a WG with a very constrained
mission, and it is suffering from horrible mission creep at this point
in time.  It has itself become an example of one of the primary problems
it is supposed to address -- an unfocussed rambling bitch session.

> If I was looking for just any
> forum there are many to choose from.
> 
> The UDRP has already been brought up and not by me,

It was off-topic then, too.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html