Re: [wg-review] Bill of Particulars

[DPF <david@farrar.com>]

On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 16:37:25 -0800, Bret A. Fausett wrote:

>It's a good idea to gather these in one place. I'll add my point to the list
>below:
>
>> 1. Unrepresented constituents
>> 2. Unrepresentative constituencies
>
>3. Process does not encourage compromise among parties
>   with competing positions.

4.  Arguable the weighting of constituencies (currently all are equal)
on Names Council is inappropriate?  How can one decide what is
appropriate and who decides?

5.  GA feel marginalised and powerless.

DPF
________________________________________________________________________
<david at farrar dot com>
NZ Usenet FAQs - http://www.dpf.ac.nz/usenet/nz
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html