Re: [wg-review]11. [IDNH] individual domain name owners, Report requested by Members of the WG-Review

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:22:31PM -0500, Joanna Lane wrote:
> 
> On Jan 3rd Philip wrote:
> < I am sure the WG chair can co-ordinate discussion and composite replies.>
> 
> Maybe not. First, this WG was not told that it's results would be "added to
> existing replies" , and second, Philip's stated terms of reference for this
> group are vastly different terms from those laid out to members by the Chair
> on December 23rd.
> For convenience I have pasted both versions below:

You left out a very important part of YJ's message:

    This was drafted before Names Council(NC) teleconference and it was
    provided as reference document to the NC before Review WG is formed
    formally. 

That is, YJ did not send out the terms of reference approved by the NC,
but instead apparently sent an earlier, much different, version.  This
is quite unfortunate, because it seriously misled many people about the
intent of this WG. 

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html