Re: [wg-review] Bill of Particulars

["Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>]

Facts, Ken, facts. 

On this list, I have criticized "the structure of" two constituencies: the registry constituency (do you wish to defend that structure?) and my own non-commercial constituency, which I said was "too heterogeneous" and based an "incoherent category."  

All of my other criticisms have been focused on the imbalanced way the constituencies were defined. It is not an attempt to say anything about the actions or representativeness of other constituencies.

>>> Digitel - Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@digitel.net> 01/03/01 11:56AM >>>
milton ...

you have taken to yourself the right to criticize the structure and actions
of other constituancies and yet you brand as "unprofessional" attempts by
someone to focus the spotlight you lit on areas in which you have a
significant influence.

you make your points your way milton....



--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html