ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] Bill of Particulars


Ken, can you clarify something?

At 10:32 AM 1/3/01, Ken Stubbs wrote:
>c. i fully acknowledge my principal activity and anyone i interact with
>certainly has the opportunity to evaluate my comments and participation in
>light of my open disclosure.
>this should not preclude my participation in the individual constituancy.

and:

"it would seem more appropriate to me if this self-formation process was 
managed and facilitated by the parties who are seeking constituancy status 
rather than members of other constituancies......."

Could you reconcile those statements for me, please?

Thanks,
Greg


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>