[[wg-review]11. [IDNH] individual domain name owners, Report requested by Members of the WG-Review

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Kent,
Thank you.

I would just put on record that this WG apparently labored under the wrong
referenced terms between December 23rd and Jan 3rd and not one member or the
Chair drew attention to it. That represents some 50% of the WG's allotted
lifetime being misdirected and I would add to that, members have yet to be
pointed to the NC *approved* terms of reference to which you now refer.

As you say, unfortunate circumstances, but if these could be viewed as
seriously misleading members, then I fail to see why it would not constitute
reasonable grounds for granting an extension to the life of this WG.

This issue now also affects the co-Chair election.

Joanna


On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:22:31PM -0500, Joanna Lane wrote:
>
> On Jan 3rd Philip wrote:
> < I am sure the WG chair can co-ordinate discussion and composite
replies.>
>
> Maybe not. First, this WG was not told that it's results would be "added
to
> existing replies" , and second, Philip's stated terms of reference for
this
> group are vastly different terms from those laid out to members by the
Chair
> on December 23rd.
> For convenience I have pasted both versions below:

You left out a very important part of YJ's message:

    This was drafted before Names Council(NC) teleconference and it was
    provided as reference document to the NC before Review WG is formed
    formally.

That is, YJ did not send out the terms of reference approved by the NC,
but instead apparently sent an earlier, much different, version.  This
is quite unfortunate, because it seriously misled many people about the
intent of this WG.

--
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html