<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] Bill of Particulars
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:49:52AM -0800, Chris McElroy wrote:
> You obviously are not that well informed about Nonprofit Entities ken. If
> their bylaws do not state their purpose is contributing money to ICANN, then
> it doesn't matter how much money they have they can't cut the check.
Sorry, you are totally incorrect. In fact, many of the non-profits in
the NCC have paid (as Milton mentioned, we have collected $4000).
> Secondly your statement below "educational institutions, non-profit
> foundations etc. are all funded in order to make them viable & effective."
> Not true either. Not all nonprofits and educational institutions are well
> funded. Your lack of knowledge in this area astounds me.
Sorry. First of all, Ken didn't write "well-funded". And second, in
fact many educational institutions and non-porofit organizations are
extremely well-funded.
> You posted "let me try to tackle this one real quick milton"
> While you may understand many technical aspects and a few political ones,
> Ken. Maybe you shouldn't have tackled this one so quick.
Thanks for the pointless flame. We need more of those.
--
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|