RE: [wg-review] Re: [Agenda] Issues List as it was last posted

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Which goes back to my point about confusion. Mail readers (even MS-Exchange)
don't do that well. That is more the province of news readers.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris McElroy [mailto:watch-dog@inreach.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 6:50 PM
> To: Greg Burton
> Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: [wg-review] Re: [Agenda] Issues List as it was last posted
> 
> 
> Thank you Greg. So am I to understand that by the use of 
> different headers
> we are to discuss all of these topics at the same time rather 
> than just go
> down the list?
> 
> Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg Burton" <sidna@feedwriter.com>
> To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
> Cc: <watch-dog@inreach.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 4:25 PM
> Subject: [Agenda] Issues List as it was last posted
> 
> 
> > As per your request, Chris, this was the last post in that 
> thread. Thanks
> > to Rod Dixon for his work in compiling this.
> >
> > >Structural and/or Procedural Problem areas within the DNSO 
> that impede
> its
> > >mission of becoming a bottom-up policy coordination body:
> >
> >
> > >1. Unrepresented constituents.
> > >2. Unrepresentative constituencies.
> > >3. Process does not encourage compromise among parties  
> with competing
> > >positions.
> > >  4. The process is not producing adequate documents for the board.
> > >5. No agreed definition for "domain name"
> > >6. No agreed definition for "end user" and "real end user"
> > >7. Poor clarification of issues that ICANN has charter to 
> address that
> > >directly affect "end users".
> > >8. Process does not encourage compromise among parties  
> with competing
> > >positions.
> > >9.  Arguable the weighting of constituencies (currently 
> all are equal) on
> > >Names Council is inappropriate?  How can one decide what 
> is appropriate
> and
> > >who decides?
> > >10. GA feel marginalized and powerless.
> >
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html