Re: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem

[J J Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 13:01 7/01/01 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:

>[karl A]
>> I support the determination of group opinion by the use of solid
>> procedures that include the placement of clearly articulated issues before
>> a clearly formed electorate who make clear votes that are counted.
>> 
>> As it stands, as a member of the ICANN Board of Directors, I am very
>> unlikely to give credence to any matter that comes out of the DNSO unless
>> I see objective data indicating that the DNSO has reached its conclusion
>> by something better than the hand waving that has to date been called
>> "consensus".
>
>You know, this is the very first time I have seen of a member of the BoD
>blatantly using their position in an attempt to influence the direction
>of a supposedly bottom up process.  Tell you what, Karl, why don't you 
>just tell us what we are supposed to produce?  It would save us a lot 
>of effort.
>

If other ICANN directors would have made similar posts to mailing lists and WG-s
I would have applauded their commitment, (as opposed to lip-service) to the
bottom-up process. 

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html