Re: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

> >1: Should the minimum criteria for joining IDNH Constituency include
> >agreement to a set of rules designed to encourage consensus building and
> >productive communications?
> >YES [     ]
> >NO  [     ]
> >
> > 2. Should documentation on consensus building and productive
communications
> >be forwarded to members at the time of subscription?
> >
> >YES [     ]
> >NO  [     ]
> >
> >3. Should WG chairs be required to undertake training in consensus
building
> >and productive communication before heading a consensus-process WG or
task
> >force?
> >
> >YES [     ]
> >NO  [     ]
> >
> >I so, how can this be implemented?
> >
> >Please feel free to comment
>
>
> With permission of the Chair, I would like to put these questions up in
the
> Polling Booth, so hat a consensus, or lack of it can be easily tabulated.
> For those who would like to modify either the question or their reply
> (yes,but..  or No,but..) the Booth provides for a public comment line.
>
> If the Chair could formulate additional questions where the Booth could be
> helpful in gathering the WG's opinions without overloading the mailing
list,
> please let us have them.

Hello Joop and all,

I think it would not do any harm to survey this in the Polling Booth.
However,
it would be more productive to define what "consensus-building" is like
first
prior to the survey for those who are not sure of what they are answering
to.

Thanks,
YJ

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html