Re: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem

["Chris McElroy" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic


----- Original Message -----
From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
To: <jo-uk@rcn.com>; "J J Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
Cc: <WG-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem


> > >1: Should the minimum criteria for joining IDNH Constituency include
> > >agreement to a set of rules designed to encourage consensus building
and
> > >productive communications?
> > >YES [  X   ]
> > >NO  [     ]
> > >
> > > 2. Should documentation on consensus building and productive
> communications
> > >be forwarded to members at the time of subscription?
> > >
> > >YES [  X   ]
> > >NO  [     ]
> > >
> > >3. Should WG chairs be required to undertake training in consensus
> building
> > >and productive communication before heading a consensus-process WG or
> task
> > >force?
> > >
> > >YES [     ]
> > >NO  [     ]

There should be a choice for none of the above if one-person one-vote is
used instead for both 2 and 3.

> > >
> > >I so, how can this be implemented?
> > >
> > >Please feel free to comment
> >
> >
> > With permission of the Chair, I would like to put these questions up in
> the
> > Polling Booth, so hat a consensus, or lack of it can be easily
tabulated.
> > For those who would like to modify either the question or their reply
> > (yes,but..  or No,but..) the Booth provides for a public comment line.
> >
> > If the Chair could formulate additional questions where the Booth could
be
> > helpful in gathering the WG's opinions without overloading the mailing
> list,
> > please let us have them.

How about this one.

Would you rather have a one-person one-vote system, with reports on the
minority position/s as well as the majority, rather than one of the various
consensus methods that have been described so far?

Consensus {    }
One-person one-vote {   }

>
> Hello Joop and all,
>
> I think it would not do any harm to survey this in the Polling Booth.
> However,
> it would be more productive to define what "consensus-building" is like
> first
> prior to the survey for those who are not sure of what they are answering
> to.
>
> Thanks,
> YJ
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html